top of page

When Perfection Is the Enemy of Quality Culture: Lessons from the Nuclear Security Enterprise

  • Writer: Adam Witthauer
    Adam Witthauer
  • Jun 11
  • 3 min read

The culture in the Nuclear Security Enterprise (NSE), particularly with regards to quality, was without a doubt the best I've experienced. One thing that really made it great was the common understanding that perfection is impossible. While that may sound odd at face value, what made it powerful was that when issues occurred, they tended to be taken a lot less as a personal blow.


We knew our processes were robust, but perfection will always be a moving target. When processes aren't as well defined, we count on people to make sure things are done right. When we count on people and not processes, every thing that does go wrong becomes a personal failure.


Outstretched handing offering a treat to a small bird
Earning trust is difficult but starts with psychological safety

Auditors know this and have witnessed this. This is often the main reason that blaming people in CAPA is seen as a red flag to processes that aren't in control.


The second order effect this has on the culture of the organization is it makes bad news very difficult to deliver. People are ashamed to own failures, and people feel like their competence is always under scrutiny. Transparency disappears, and soon there are skeletons in the closet that nobody knows about. These skeletons eventually become discovered, and usually the result is chaos and firefighting.


The third order effect this has on the culture is that people often find it hard to ask for help. One of the biggest challenges I had as an NSE manager was that when new employees came from other industries, we sometimes had to coach them into understanding it was OK to ask others for help if they came across something they were unsure of. We had to convince them that they would not be judged negatively on asking questions.


Far too often, new employees with outside experience would spend hours trying to figure out something relatively simple on their own. One of my mentors had a great rule: If you find yourself spending more than 15 minutes trying to figure something out, phone a friend. They were always happy to share their experience. It's impossible to capture every nuance in written procedures and regulations, and someone with experience can provide examples and stories about what the policy in question means, why it's important and what to watch out for, how to detect it, etc.


This culture also supports succession planning. Everybody talked to each other enough that we all knew who the SMEs were. Have a question about GD&T? Talk to Steve. Have a question about lot control? Talk to Sue. Senior engineers' reputations preceded them, and they also got practice coaching others with issues, which made their leadership potential much more visible.


Perfection as the enemy of quality culture

The Nuclear Security Enterprise didn't have a perfect quality culture because it demanded perfection from its people; it had a great quality culture because it didn't. Robust processes, psychological safety, and a shared understanding that issues are data rather than indictments created an environment where problems surfaced early, knowledge flowed freely, and people grew into leaders. That kind of culture doesn't happen by accident, and it isn't reserved for government programs with unlimited resources. The principles behind it are transferable to any manufacturing or defense supplier organization willing to take an honest look at how they respond when things go wrong. At Big W Engineering Solutions, we've lived this culture firsthand, and we help organizations build quality management systems and the cultural infrastructure to support them. If your team struggles to surface bad news, leans on blame when things fail, or loses institutional knowledge every time a senior engineer walks out the door, let's talk. The fix starts with the system, not the people.

Comments


bottom of page